The "War on Drugs" is a fraud. Nothing more.

By: LONO
July, 4th 2011
Fort Worth, Texas-

The fraudulent "War on Drugs" has gone on for 40 years, and it is now time to put it to bed. Let it go quietly into that good night. Let it slip from our collective consciousness like a case of 24 hour food poisoning, or a nightmare that we dare not think of again, for fear of its return...

Did we not learn anything from the rampant crime created by "prohibition" in the roaring 20's? Did we as a country forget how it gave rise to crime syndicates galore, and the likes of "Bugsy" Siegel and Al Capone?

No.
We didn't forget.
At all.

We just assimilated the crime syndicates into our government. We gave the lunatics the keys to the asylum. If "Bugsy" and Al were alive today, they would each be sitting as a director for some useless government agency. Maybe in the ATF or the FDA.

Maybe Al would be a sitting Justice on the United States Supreme Court.

Maybe "Bugsy" would be the head of the DEA.

Either way, it would be no different than the unending reign of criminality in the US government. Would Al Capone investigate allegations of wrongdoing by his own department?

Would "Bugsy"?

Hell no they wouldn't, just like the 911 commission or the Warren commission didn't investigate wrongdoings of the US government in either case.

The "War on Drugs" is a fraud. A farce of the highest degree, just like the "War" on terrorism. These wars only exist to justify the governments own consumption of astronomical budgets and the furtherance of its own bloated existence.

All on our dime.

Sure, some drugs are bad. (sex can kill you too but that doesn't stop anyone from doing it.)

Hundreds of thousands of people each year are arrested and imprisoned because they were in possession of "some drug" that some bureaucrat in some government agency said was "bad for you" because the private sale of which either:

1. Didn't benefit the government directly, because it wasn't reasonably easy to tax.
2. Took revenue from "Big Pharma" (people have no right to decide what they put into their own bodies)
3. Wouldn't generate funds for state and federal government by stimulating the prison-industrial complex.

Never-mind that "some drug" usually finds its way into the US, and then into the hands of the consumer by governmental means.

Don't believe me?

Do a little research on "Air America", "Iran/Contra" and the CIA's connection to importing Cocaine right to the hands of the L.A. Gang hierarchy. Look into WHY the US Military is guarding poppy fields in Afghanistan as we speak...


Not only does our GOV import it, and make money off its sale, but it also makes money off of its prosecution of drug crimes by prison labor.

YES, some "criminals" are bad, and need to be behind bars, but some don't. Drug addiction is a sickness, not a crime.


Many times, in the US Prison system, the non violent tend to spend more time incarcerated than the violent do.  For example, when California recently had to let some 3000 offenders go due to prison overcrowding, guess who they let go?

The non violent drug offenders?

No.

They let violent offenders and gang members back out on to the streets.

Now, WHY they would do such a thing?

- Problem-Reaction-Solution-.

The violent are harder to control once IN prison, and the non violent tend to "toe the line".

Plus, the more destruction and havoc caused in the real world by those released "violent offenders"  means more federal funding for Law Enforcement agencies. The larger the budget, the bigger SNAFUS can be created to "protect regular people" from the big bad wolves like terrorism, drug use, and Gun crimes like the many flawlessly executed (not) operations by the "incompetent" BATFE Bureau of Alchohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (OP: Fast and Furious; "Gunwalker"; "Branch Davidia", etc) debacles, etc.

The BAFTE is NOT incompetent. They are performing just as intended. They are systematically whittling away at our individual freedoms, right in plain view, and the masses do nothing to stop it. The only war being fought is against the US Constitution and the freedom loving citizens of this once great country.


The system imprisons the nonviolent. Then it lets the violent go to create more violence, to force the people to DEMAND that something be done about it.

The more we are bombarded with this false propaganda the belief that it is real seeps in. We dont look deeper to discover the motivations behind the statistics. We just blindly swallow the lies we are being served.


"We, the people" will then vote for larger budgets for the police, the police will get the cash, and then think up some ridiculous use for the budget like [OPERATION: GUNWALKER] allowing inconceivable amounts of weaponry to be traffiked to the Cartels in Mexico (illegally I might add), so the ATF can say how much we need to tighten and shut down the second amendment, because "bad people" are exploiting it.

Well, the "bad people" that are "exploiting" it are the criminals in the government that think all wars are meant to be sustainable; and those in law enforcement and government that feel it is better to justify their own existence by creating more problems (enslave and terrify), rather than doing their damn jobs and solving the real problems we have. (serve and protect).

But that can't happen. Not if more of the sleeping masses don't wake up.

If we actually woke up and took personal responsibility for the situation we are in my god...

We wouldn't need a "paramilitary" police force anymore...

A simple but proven effective city police force... "Sheriffs  and Deputies"..sworn to "Protect and Serve" (Not a Federally funded goon squad only concerned with collecting revenue) would be all that is needed to insure domestic tranquility...

And that’s the truth… as I see it.


InSights Ink! Media
© 2011,  All rights reserved

Why the US military gets a bad rap

By: Lono
July 2, 2011

Fort Worth, Texas-

Recently, on an Internet discussion board, I came across the following post from a 20+year Army officer.

I am an Army Officer and have been for over 20 years. I am sick and tired of the talk from people on this forum that wouId say that I conspire against them.
I am am sick and tired of people saying that we are going to kill them or put them in camps.
I am sick and tired of people saying that we did 9/11 to have wars to fight.
I am sick and tired of being called a baby killer and an oppressor.
We are here do uphold the Constitution and protect the citizens of the US.
Why am I demonized on these forums. Why am I hated.
I gave my life to protect and defend our country,
I give my life and soul to give others Freedom.
Why am I hated in my own country.

Before I take a stab at answering this question, let me first mention that I swore the same oath to protect and defend the constitution as the poster, so don't misunderstand.



To quote Bill Hicks:

I have the unpopular position of being for the war, but against the soldiers...

I'll try to explain why those sentiments exists.

Most of the "Esprit de Corps" that exists in today's military (most prevalent in the enlisted ranks, but also in the officer corps working up the ladder up to the field grade) is nothing short of a flag-sucking, patriotic orgy that exists to glorify the asinine orders from the self-serving politicians rather than the good of the country as a whole.

Throughout history there have always been those that have a self serving desire to rule (politicians), and they accomplish that by exploiting those with a selfless desire to protect (military).

Its easy to do this because "those who serve" start off with a misguided belief that those who "rule" are smarter or in a better position to determine what the national interests should be.

This is not the case.

At all.

The men and women who choose to lay it all on the line and "serve" are my brothers and sisters, but I fear they aren't quite getting the big picture.

They are deeply committed, i'll concede that- because it takes "guts" to put it all out there to be shot off for what some inbred retard in political office thinks is justified...

To quote R. Lee Ermy in his Iconic role as Gunny Hartmann in Full Metal Jacket:

Private Joker is silly and Ignorant, but he has guts, and guts is enough.

Well as it turns out, guts is NOT enough. It takes critical thought and brains to realize that some REMF (Rear Echelon Mother Fucker) making policy and giving orders may not actually have the best interests of the nation at heart, and in most cases doesn't even think twice about spilling my blood, or yours, or our brothers and sisters, or the armies or citizens of a foreign land for personal gain.

The days of...

"Setting your motherfucker to receive"...

and

"Ours is not to wonder why, ours is just to do and die"...

are over.

Speaking to all my brothers and sisters serving in the armed forces: It is time to wake up.

Open your eyes and think critically about whether or not our nations "best interests" are in guarding poppy fields in Afghanistan, or searching for nonexistent "WMD"s in Iraq, or carpet bombing everyday people like you and I in Libya, or ousting humanitarian leaders by violent means like was done in East Timor, Or attempting to retard the spread of "communism" like in North Vietnam while the very policy took hold in the US Politics while everyone was distracted, or sustaining ANY BS war just to sustain the Military Industrial Complex's lust for more and more cash.

We (American public/American Military) are nothing more than a credit or a debit on a balance sheet to these people.

Your service to protect is honorable, but the motivations by the chain of command are highly suspect.

-And that’s the truth… as I see it.

I hope that helps.

InSights Ink! Media
© 2011,  All rights reserved

Personal responsibility, Public school, and the fall of modern society

By: Lono
June 26, 2011

Fort Worth, Texas-

As I see it; all the problems that we face in today’s world boil down to an overall lack of personal responsibility.  Finance and education don’t get a free pass. Because of the sloth, distraction, abuse, or outright neglect... of everyday people… to do what’s right in any given situation, the government ends up doing what we should be doing for ourselves.

For example, recently the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) released a report showing that the average person does not have the financial literacy required to navigate the modern economy. The same study also shows that financial literacy has actually improved in the United States since the 1970’s!

 While these results may be accurate on paper, they do little more than simply sidestep or whitewash the underlying issue, which is:

When it comes to banking and finance, American people are just plain IGNORANT.

Does anyone here remember learning about “fractional reserve banking” in high school Economics class?
Anyone?

How about the “Federal reserve system”?

Anyone?

…Credit default swaps, mortgage backed securities, derivatives, or predatory lending?

Anyone?

Bueller?                       

Fry?…

I didn’t think so.

Most of the youth I come in contact with have no understanding of finance whatsoever - and I feel that may be by design.

The public education system (or lack thereof) may be the single greatest issue facing the US today, that we can actually do something about. I’ll even take that a step further and say that the profound lack of responsibility exhibited by the general public, for the education of their children, has single-handedly brought about the complete and utter destruction of freedom in modern society.
If we as a society would simply stand up and accept that the “responsibility” to educate our children lies not with the government but with ourselves, we can begin to teach our children to how the world actually works instead of subjecting them to the phony, feel-good, politically correct “propaganda” that oozes out of public school textbooks.

 As an informed society, we might just be able to win the war (that’s being fought daily) for the minds of our children. If more Americans can wake up to the fact that government has NO PLACE dictating how we raise and educate our children, and we cease putting blind faith in “big government” to teach our children the knowledge that they need to navigate in this world, the solution wouldn’t seem nearly as elusive. All public school does is indoctrinate our children to the status quo through a hard corps regime of propaganda from the first day they set foot in Kindergarten.

It does not educate. It does not encourage critical thought.

It installs a pre-determined doctrine of thought, through repetition, that induces students to give up basic political, social, or religious beliefs and attitudes and to accept contrasting regimented ideas.

And that, my friends is also the “Mirriam-Webster” definition of brainwashing.

While we are on the subject of dictionaries, we may as well cover a few relevant definitions so we can share an “unclouded” view of the terrain.

“Indoctrinate” means:

1. To instruct in a body of doctrine or principles.
2. To imbue with a partisan or ideological point of view
syn. [indoctrination - teaching someone to accept doctrines uncritically , brainwashing - forcible indoctrination into a new set of attitudes and beliefs inculcation, ingraining, instilling - teaching or impressing upon the mind by frequent instruction or repetition]

“Educate” means:
1. To develop the innate capacities of, especially by schooling or instruction.
2. To stimulate or develop the mental or moral growth of.

The words “indoctrinate” and “educate”, though similar, are not synonyms at all. They have very different meanings.

So, with that in mind, and discarding any euphemisms or doublespeak, what is commonly accepted as “public school education” is, in actuality, primary school indoctrination.

According to a web article at www.teach-kids-attitude-1st.com by Don Berg :

“The definition of education in common usage, that education is merely the delivery of knowledge, skills and information from teachers to students, is inadequate … Being an educated person means you have access to optimal states of mind regardless of the situation you are in…able to perceive accurately, think clearly and act effectively to achieve self-selected goals and aspirations.”

Mr. Berg goes on to say that education is “cognitive cartography… a process of mapping your experiences and finding a variety of reliable routes to optimal states when you find yourself in non-optimal states.”

I totally agree.

But, can anyone show me a curriculum focusing on good, logical decision making taught at public schools?

Again, I didn’t think so.

Due to public schools heavy reliance on federal funding, teachers are often forced to “teach the test” and cater to the lowest common denominator, rather than actually inspiring students to think on their own. Eligibility requirements for public schools to receive federal funding are so regimented and strict that more often than not, teachers only have the time to instruct students what to think, instead of how to think.

Through the study of quantum physics, we are clearly shown that there is no description of reality that is accurate unless it includes the observer in its description.  Any measurement is relative only to the instrument used for the measurement, and the instruments location in space/time. There is no position from which real reality can be seen. All information is all abstracted by individual interpretation, and then aligns itself to fit within your established belief system.
While basic classes such as language and introductory mathematics run little risk of being “tinted” by the federal governments standardized schedule of indoctrination, almost every other subject from elementary to high school is fundamentally capable of programming our kids with a belief system that may run contrary to our own.

And so, our little journey comes full circle, back to a point where the main question is: Do you feel comfortable with strangers installing a foreign belief system, designed and regulated by the US government, to your children’s “Operating System”?


Once again, I didn’t think so.

Having children, the protection/providing for/of those children, and the education of those children is just one more aspect of our lives that the government has no business interfering in.


How often do you hear:

“Oh that is horrible, someone should DO something”?

How often do you see the person making that statement actually step up and take the responsibility to do what needs to be done?

Rarely, but it does happen. We call those who step up and do the right thing “heroes”.  Heroes are a good thing.

Afterwards, there is always someone crawling out of the shadows to take credit for the actions of another. We call those people politicians. We mostly consider them a bad thing.

One last question: When is the last time you remember a politician (other than Ron Paul) taking personal responsibility for ANYTHING?

Anyone?


Again, I think you get my point.

Politicians are generally the people that exploit the heroic actions of others for personal gain and public power. Once they have it, they then use that power to legislate “their” brand of morality and kindness. Not ours, but theirs.

Trouble is, if you have to make a law to force someone into helping others or showing kindness, it isn’t kindness anymore. The requirement cancels the honor. Freedom is the only scenario in which heroes can be born.
 Freedom is allows those that take personal responsibility to step up when they are needed. The free do not create situations that force the government to step in and regulate our freedoms.

We do not require legislation to dictate our morality and education.

To quote Brian Tracy-

“If you don’t like the way something is, change it. If you aren’t willing to change it yourself, don’t complain.”

Of course our kids are financially illiterate. Of course they are historically illiterate. Of course they are easy to manipulate. They are manipulated by the system from kindergarten through High School. Even Universities have their own specific political tilt, which in most cases has nothing to do whatsoever with the parent’s values, unless the parent guides and directs the children as good parents do.

Remember, it’s all in the language. No Orwellian doublespeak or euphemisms, no political correctness... just words for what they actually mean.


-And that’s the truth… as I see it.


InSights Ink! Media
© 2011,  All rights reserved

Don Bergs full article on education can be found at: http://www.teach-kids-attitude-1st.com/definition-of-education.html

Meet the x37B, the Air Forces Unmanned Space Vehicle

Cape Canaveral, Fla.- The U.S. Air Force's robotic X-37B mini-shuttle "space plane" launched on its classified second mission Saturday March 5, 2011 at 5:46PM (2246 GMT). The unmanned X-37B lifted off from Cape Canaveral atop an Atlas 5 rocket.

This is the second X-37B spacecraft built for the Air Force by Boeing's Space and Intelligence Systems division, and carries the name Orbital Test Vehicle 2, or OTV-2. The X37B OTV2 is capable of vastly extended orbital missions due to its solar array power system, which allows it to stay in orbit for up to 270 days

The first X-37B spacecraft launched in April 2010 and returned to Earth in December after an apparently successful test flight, though the details of that mission and that of the OTV2 – are classified. The first X-37B mission lasted 225 days. (Mike Wall, Space.com)

X-37B (shown here in an illustration) is an unmanned, autonomous military space plane, capable of extended orbital missions followed by auto-touchdowns.

With its blunt nose and stubby wings, the Boeing spacecraft somewhat resembles the 40 year old NASA space shuttle, miniaturized and updated.

This SPACE.com graphic takes a look inside the X-37B space plane and its Atlas 5 rocket.

  But that's where the similarity ends.

The X37b is much smaller. Roughly 29 feet (almost 9 meters) long and 14 feet wide (nearly 4.5 meters). The single vertical stabilizer of the space shuttle has been replaced by two advanced "ruddervators" and the elongated fuselage sports a payload bay about the size of a pickup truck bed.

Designed to launch either vertically inside the nose cone of a rocket, or horizontally from a "white knight" aircraft launch platform [similar to Sir Richard Bransom's Virgin Galactic], the X37B can remain in orbit for extended periods, and then land horizontally on a runway, like its predecessor. (continued after photo)

Undated X37B runway photo, (Courtesy USAF)

Unlike the NASA space shuttle, however, the X37B has no human flight crew. According to a pre-launch statement issued by the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office, those "mundane" duties are now carried out autonomously by "Artificial Intelligence", without aid, assistance, or need of a human pilot.

"There is no one on the ground with a joystick flying it."- Lt. Colonel Troy Giese,  X37B Project Manager, AFRCO

Yes boys and girls, you read me right: "AI." (Sky Net, here we come...)


The X37B began life as a civilian project

A crew of vehicle handlers clad in suits to protect against hazardous materials like any "remaining rocket fuel" approach the X-37B robot space plane after its successful Dec. 3d. landing at Vandenberg AFB in California.

It was used as an experimental "test bed" for NASA in 1999, and continued in service of the space agency until project control shifted to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in 2004 when the NASA funding ran dry. After two years with DARPA at the helm, they ultimately passed control to the USAF in 2006.
The Air Force "Rapid Capabilities Office" currently oversees the X-37B space plane program, and offers little explanation as to why the former civilian project is now shrouded in secrecy.

So, what exactly does it DO?

Recovery crews take measurements and other readings after its Dec. 3 landing at Vandenberg. The X-37B's unique V-shaped "ruddervators" — which serve as its tail stabilizers — are visible as well as a deployed air brake.

Air Force officials have not said much about first X-37B mission, and they're been similarly tight-lipped about the second flight with the OTV-2 vehicle.
What the Air Force has said, is that the X-37B spacecraft "should help the Air Force test and demonstrate new 'technologies' — such as guidance, navigation, and control systems — that could be used on future satellites."

The secrecy surrounding the X-37B has led to extensive speculation that the plane could be a 'space weapon' of some sort, though Air Force officials have repeatedly denied that charge.  Some "experts" have postulated that it is a platform for 'space reconnaissance'.

X-37B space plane is seen in profile as post-landing work continues. The logos of Boeing and USAF are visible on the reusable spacecraft's hull. The payload bay can hold experiments and small satellites in addition to its solar array panel that it uses for long term, sustained power.

Photos released by the Air Force, show post-flight ground operations being conducted by 2 person crews working in high level "Hazardous Material" containment suits. Although Space.com attempts to explain this away as a precaution taken to protect against any remaining "rocket fuel"; the presence of the NBC (nuclear/biological/chemical) suits only manages to increase speculation regarding the X37B's classified military purpose, and seems to run afoul to the 'space reconnaissance platform' hypothesis.

Could this be the beginning of the weaponization of space that Wernher von Braun warned us against?

It does indeed seem to have the 'requisite' curriculum vitae. It is a DoD (Department of Defense) project after all, and it appears to require more than your average, run of the mill ground crew to handle ground work, data retrieval and electronic "debriefing".

One HAS to wonder, where indeed has it been, that requires ground crews to wear "Nuclear-Biological-Chemical" suits post flight?

Has the X37B retrieved nuclear material from a defective satellite?

Do we have 'enemies' in space that 'we, the people' do not know about? (Intergalactic alien "Al-Queda" maybe?)

Has it been in contact with "Little Green Men" in flying saucers?

Or, has it been "hangin ten"& 'surfing' the Van Allen Radiation belt?

Chances are that we may never know, but it sure is something to think about. The Air Force says it should help "demonstrate new technologies", but "just to be cautious" they wear NBC suits to examine it when it returns from its classified mission.

I'll just leave the rest to you, my readers. Consider this the beginning of your journey to enlightenment. I formally challenge you to...THINK.

Question everything...The information I have presented to you in this article, and what you uncover on your own.

EVERYTHING.

Form your own opinion, Think for yourself. Free yourself-

The Second "death" of Osama bin Laden

Edit

The second "death" of Osama Bin Laden

by Cris Fuller on Friday, May 6, 2011 at 1:46pm

Why is it that whenever some supposed "secret" operation takes place, its always the PR Hungry Navy taking credit? There are quite a few operators that do a fantastic job at this type of operation that you never hear about in movies or on TV.

The SEALS seem to have a good publicist, and an even greater mysticism to the American public [and the world] so they get used in situations of a "secret" nature that aren't. This is classic Orwellian doublespeak. Prudence would dictate that particulars of [a] mission (assets, operators, etc) not be compromised as a matter of OPSEC.

The Obama administration's promise of "transparency" does not extend to compromising operational security. EVER. An announcement of any kind, public or private, assigning blame or giving credit [read responsibility] thereby putting your asset at risk is what is referred to as a "burn."

Washington has a bad habit of self aggrandizing and fraud in attempts to distract from the real issues. Obama is no different. He is becoming a better "Bush" than "W" was. His speech [Obama] on the fabricated operation bringing about the second "death" of Osama Bin Laden was the most disgusting example of "patting oneself on the back" I have ever seen.

America better wake up, and wake up fast. The game isn't about "us" anymore, and it hasn't been for a while. The Powers that be are DESPERATE. They are grasping at straws because they are losing the information war. Anything that can be done to obscure the issues, quell the masses, stay in power, and neutralize intelligent dissent WILL BE DONE.

The country is on the brink of economic collapse. We are involved in SEVERAL conflicts [read wars] we cant afford, where American people [soldiers] are DYING. To pay for it -the "Fed" keeps printing more money, and the dollar continues to fall. Gas prices are skyrocketing because the dollar isn't worth as much, and masses of people are still clinging to obsolete and outdated "partisan" allegiances.

It isn't about Obama vs. Bush.
It isn't about Left vs. Right.  

The governmental policies of this administration are simply an extension of the previous administration, regardless of partisan affiliation. Republican or Democrat, the policies have no major shift from election to election.

Again, here's the damning passage from the book "Tragedy and Hope" by Carroll Quigley, Bill and Hillary Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University:

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy."

Its right there. The left/right paradigm is gone. The line has been blurred. The whole farce is a simple case of Obama practicing CYA.

HERE ARE THE FACTS:

  1.2 MILLION: People in killed in road accidents EVERY YEAR.
       430,000: Americans killed by cigarettes EVERY YEAR. (The equivalent of 9/11 repeated every two days forever.)
       400,000: Americans die each year from obesity (while much greater numbers around the world starve to death).
           8,437: Civilians killed by US/UK attacks in Iraq in 2003.
           3,800: Civilians killed by US/UK attacks in Afghanistan by 2002.
       135,000: Deaths from cancer in UK alone EVERY YEAR
780,000,000: People starving to death RIGHT NOW.
513,000,000: Number of people without access to safe drinking water.

People in USA, Killed by terrorism, since the year 2000 : 2,752 (all on 9/11)
People killed in the UK, Killed by terrorism, since the year 2000 : 52 (all on 7/7)

But we spend TRILLIONS executing the war on terror........................................................

The System has FAILED

Fort Worth, Texas- It has been said, that it is always darkest before the dawn. It has also been said that the closer you are to achieving your goals, the farther away they seem.
To steal a quote from Thomas Jefferson:

“I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny imposed upon the mind of man".

Instead of simply writing and complaining about the massive ongoing campaign to take away our liberties, I chose to do something about it.


I joined “We are CHANGE” and started a chapter in Arlington, TX.

No more than 12 hours after taking on this commitment, We received a notice on the door of the apartment that we were in violation of the pet clause in the lease, and were being fined $300 for the violation, plus $400 for a pet deposit, and an additional $400 for some random pet “fee”, as well as being forced to thin out our family (get rid of one of the pets.)

We have 3... Clarity, A small female cat; Charlie a 6 month old male Chihuahua; and Zeke, a 2 year old male Corgi mix that would give his life for me, and vice versa.

For this heinous crime, the Apartment complex is asking for an additional $1100, on top of the $1150 rent, in the middle of a recession.

Now, I’m not sure about any of you, but to me these animals are not a nuisance to anyone. Sure, Zeke tends to bark a lot when I’m away, (he’s a bit of a co-dependent with strong protection instincts) but that is only natural.

Here is the dilemma. Due to the exquisite economy we find ourselves in, our household is operating on one income. After losing my “Director of Marketing” position in corporate America, I have been unable to find “gainful employment”. I have exhausted my unemployment (which means that since I no longer collect, I am no longer included in national unemployment figures. Unemployment is in reality nearer to 40%, not the 9% reported by mainstream media),

I have been through the nightmare of attempting to comply with the impossible terms of a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy with no income, Lost my house, My car, my savings and my motorcycle. I have fought a horrible battle with addiction, and am dealing with the legal issues that were created as a result. I have hurt friends unintentionally. I have been an ass of the greatest magnitude. I played the American dream game, and lost it all.

Which means, in essence, I have been an exceptional burden to those who love me. I have tried to do my best to compensate for my lack monetary contribution by keeping up with housework and contributing in other ways. I have never asked for a free lunch of any kind.

Its only now that I realize that none of that dream was never mine. Everything I slaved for could evaporate without a moments notice. Buy a House outright, but miss the taxes [read: tribute to the king] a year, and "Uncle Sam" takes it away quicker than it took for you to sign the mortgage.

Property rights in this country are a Joke. You don't "own" anything. You are simply leasing your property from the government, until you can't afford to pay tribute to your "Sovereign". Just like in Medieval times, when everything the serfs owned, was regulated by the King...

You don't even have control of who you sell your property "to" in "Amerika." If it is truly yours, then wouldn't that mean, if you make a choice to sell it, then you could sell it to a buyer of your choosing?

Whatever happened to:

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone?"

Should we be forced to sell "our" property to someone who is abusive or offensive to our customers? or plans to use our property for nefarious means?

In America, no. In "Amerika", however, you can't discriminate in any way. Your property isn't yours at all - not in "Amerika."

I realize now that just like in the old Matthew Broderick movie “Wargames” this is a strange game indeed. The only winning move, is truly not to play.


After all of the above, I am still expected to fulfill a tax obligation that does nothing AT ALL to lend a hand or to help myself and others out (in similar situations not of our own creation) but it will help the “too big to fail” assholes from having to walk a day in our shoes, after foolishly gambling and squandering money that wasn’t theirs to begin with.

So, here I sit. No job other than trying to make the world a better place for everyone else (which doesn’t pay ANY bills) and No faith left in the system we are living in, because It is designed to keep the public uninformed and enslaved to a system that has failed them time and time again.

So, here I am. Right smack dab in the same “hopeless” situation as 30+% of the other people in “Amerika.”

Being forced to leave the place I live, but can’t pay for on my own, because I refuse to discard my faithful dog who is a member of the family, and saddened to the core because those that I love the most can’t see that my commitment to “We are CHANGE” is for the direct benefit of themselves and others in the exact same boat.

Gerald Celente said:

“ When people lose everything, they lose it…”

Preach on brother Gerry…

World War Three

Fort Worth, Texas- Globally, (Peaceful) mass protests have been surfacing and spreading like wildfire, demonstrating the people of the world’s dissatisfaction toward the furtherance of corporate owned governmental oligarchies, world banking cartels, and the insatiable ‘lust for power’ they exhibit in the midst of a global depression.

To highlight just a few:

• The Middle East and North Africa have been ablaze with protests, commonly referred to as the Arab Spring, that have been taking place since 18th December 2010.

• 
  To date there have been revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt; a civil war in Libya; civil uprisings in Bahrain, Syria, and Yemen; major protests in Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Morocco, and Oman; and minor protests in Djibouti, Kuwait, Lebanon, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan. The slogan of the demonstrators in the Arab world has been "The people want to bring down the regime"

• The Chinese are reported to have been protesting in a series of weekly pro-democracy street actions in over a dozen cities in mainland China since 20 February 2011, inspired by and named after the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia; 

• The Spanish Student protests, also referred to as the 15-M Movement or the Spanish revolution, are a series ongoing of demonstrations that have been growing since Sunday, May 15, 2011 with an initial call in 58 Spanish cities.

 This series of protests demands a radical change in Spanish politics, as protesters do not consider themselves to be represented by any traditional party. The Spanish media has related the protests to the economic crisis, and current protests in the Middle East and North Africa.

• 
  The protests were staged close to the local and regional elections, held on May 22. Even though protesters form a heterogeneous and ambiguous group, they share a strong rejection of the current Spanish two-party system, politicians, and political corruption. The movement's spokespeople define it as "non a-political, but non-partisan".

• On May 25 2011, the Greek version of the “Indignados” movement, began demonstrations in many cities across the country. Greece’s recent history is no stranger to protests either, considering:

• On May 5, 2010, a nationwide general strike and demonstrations in major cities took place across Greece as well. The protests were sparked by plans to cut public spending, such as wages and welfare benefits, and raise taxes as austerity measures in exchange for a €110 billion bail-out, aimed at solving the 2010-2011 Greek debt crisis. Three people were killed on the May 5 protests, which was one of the largest Greece had seen since the massive demonstrations which brought down the dictatorship in 1974.

Numerous factors have led to these protests, including dictatorships or absolute monarchy, human rights violations, government corruption (demonstrated by Wikileaks diplomatic cables) economic decline, unemployment, extreme poverty, and a number of demographic structural factors such as a large percentage of educated but dissatisfied youth within the population.

The catalysts for the revolts in all Northern African and Persian Gulf countries have been the concentration of wealth in the hands of autocrats in power for decades, insufficient transparency of its redistribution, corruption, and especially the refusal of the youth to accept the status quo. Increasing food prices and global famine rates have also been a significant factor, as they involve threats to food security worldwide and prices that approach levels of the 2007–2008 world food price crisis. Amnesty International singled out Wikileaks release of US diplomatic cables as a catalyst for the revolts.

The growing displeasure of the people (caused by an increasingly “fragile” and worsening economy, corporate sponsored wars, governmental tyranny, outright despotism, etc.) combined with the current rise of the “aggressive police state” and ongoing loss of personal freedoms; creates the perfect “powder keg” in which all it will take, will be a single spark… to plunge the World into War.

But it won’t be a “world war” the likes of which we have seen before.
As more and more people wake up to the fact that the existing system is designed to keep them down, and keep the self-proclaimed “elite” in power, the landscape will change. Political positioning and threats of military reprisal, or unsanctioned “Kinetic Military Actions” will become more and more unacceptable to the masses, and the practice will be challenged.

The world population will begin to realize that “war” as we know it, has simply been an extension of “elitist” politics by violent means.



The people are finally coming to understand that all wars in recent history have been waged; not for humanitarian concerns or ideological differences, but to be sustainable, not winnable. The overall goal of war has always been about money, resources, and finance.



Want answers? Follow the money. 

"All the perplexities, confusions, and distresses in America arise, not from defects in the Constitution or confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, as much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation." - John Quincy Adams

"But if in the pursuit of the means we should unfortunately stumble again on unfunded paper money or any similar species of fraud, we shall assuredly give a fatal stab to our national credit in its infancy. Paper money will invariably operate in the body of politics as spirit liquors on the human body. They prey on the vitals and ultimately destroy them. Paper money has had the effect in your state that it will ever have, to ruin commerce, oppress the honest, and open the door to every species of fraud and injustice."  - George Washington in a letter to Jabez Bowen, Rhode Island, Jan. 9, 1787
 

 The real power derived from conflict comes from the debt that it generates.

Who stands to benefit the most from war?  Where does the money come from to pay for it all?

Have you ever wondered why Switzerland is a neutral country?
It’s the central headquarters of the world banking cartels.

Globalist, trans-national finance cartels, like the"Federal Reserve"(which is no more a federal agency than federal express), finance the “war machine” on both sides. They loan fiat [fake] currency, at interest, to both sides of a conflict, in pursuit of the unimaginable power created by owning the debt of entire nations. He who controls the debt, rules the world.

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" - Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild, Bank of England

There is no scenario in which this can be dismissed or rationalized away. No person ON EARTH could possibly have any actual need for that kind of power, except to satisfy some self-serving, sick, desire to bring about global enslavement, like some "super-villain" in an Ian Fleming 007 novel.

But it IS happening...DAILY. And has been, for centuries.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But, if you want to continue to be the slave of the bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers continue to create money and control credit." - Sir Josiah Stamp, President, Bank of England (2nd richest man in England)

They create and loan"money" that isn’t real [doesn’t exist until the loan is signed for] to both sides of a conflict, to pay  for disposable equipment [read human life and machinery] that is designed to be "destroyed", in a conflict that they themselves created economically, only to have real “tangible" tax wages and "sweat currency” paid back, with interest.

Congressman Patman: "Mr. Eccles, how did you get the money to buy those two billion of government securities?"

Eccles: "We created it."

Patman: "Out of what?" 

Eccles: "Out of the right to issue credit money." [Federal Reserve Act of 1913]

(Testimony of Marriner Eccles, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, before the  House Banking and Currency Committee, 1941)

But here's the rub:

In the globalists plan for domination, [read: institute world government], they never intended for the populace to realize what is going on. They left out a contingency plan for what to do in the event that the world does indeed come together, and as one, they revolt.

When this spark ignites the powder keg, all hell will break loose.

There will be coup de’ etat’s galore, and chaos will ensue. The “World War”that follows, will be a world wide revolution. It will not [initally] be fought government vs. government, but by “We, the people” of the world vs. the corrupt powers that be. We outnumber them, but ignorance is on their side. It is their ally.

It will be an information war, make no mistake. It will be fought in our neighborhoods, our homes, our schools. The loss of life will be collossal. It will be hell on earth, to be sure, but eventually it will lead to a new beginning.

It seems like it is human nature to destroy ourselves, and maybe that is as it should be.

Remember, if we aren’t moving forward, we are falling down.